An American President is not a king – not even an 'elected' one – and his power to remove federal officers and honest civil servants like plaintiff is not absolute,
Here, the executive has unilaterally deemed that funds Congress appropriated for foreign aid will not be spent,
That's his constitutional duty. And that includes weeding out waste, fraud and abuse. That’s what he's doing with Elon Musk and with DOGE,
Judges aren't presidents."
The courts are not supposed to rule on political issues,
We’ve seen it since the beginning of the administration, on every single executive order, certainly on immigration enforcement actions, is to go forum shopping, they look for a federal district judge that they know is going to be sympathetic to try to block an order or action from the administration,
It’s incredible that basically a rogue judge is putting our national security at risk when they block this enforcement action without any legal basis,
If you send a clear message to these individuals that if you're coming here to commit crime or engage in terrorism, we will detain you. We will remove you immediately,
No question they're going to push the limits of our country's immigration laws until a judge, probably the justices of the United States Supreme Court, stops them,
CBP questioned Dr. Alawieh and determined that her true intentions in the United States could not be determined,
It's creative, to put it mildly, maybe just blatantly unlawful,
Conflating 'pro-terrorist,' 'anti-Semitic,' and 'anti-American' activity is an incredibly dangerous step to take,
This has been a habit of the Trump administration to overstate the danger of the people they've arrested,
Where it gets scary and this is what was so frightening about the interview is when he starts saying ‘I don’t care what the courts say – we have the right to do it anyway’ and he wouldn’t even commit to following even a Supreme Court order’ – that’s why we are so obviously in a constitutional crisis,
The whole point of Marbury v. Madison … is that you go first to the district court for federal questions and questions of constitutional law, so he’s not understanding that, ... If you think that the Supreme Court can ultimately opine, then you think the district court can opine on these matters.”
The idea that somehow there’s a class of actions that cannot be reviewed is nonsense. Everybody who lived through the 2000s knows that the war on terror was litigated in the courts over and over.”
That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, to restrict, or to restrain in any way.”
I have an Article II, where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president,
This is a showdown. This is akin to inter-branch March Madness,
Yes, separation of powers. This is the judiciary interfering in the executive function.”