That there is direct contact between the Americans and the Russians is not a bad thing if it is about finding a way to a durable and lasting peace,
I don't know what they would do at the negotiating table... if they are going to sit at the negotiating table with the aim of continuing war, then why invite them there?,
We have to make sure that Europe overcomes the challenges of the future in a strong and sovereign manner and with its back straight,
I am certain that we will be able to develop a clear position,
If the framework is given, Germany will not shy away,
This will be a great task for Europe, for the U.S. and international alliance partners,
U.S. support will remain critical and a U.S. security guarantee is essential for a lasting peace, because only the U.S. can deter Putin from attacking again,
This is not Europe that commands respect abroad. This is not the Europe that would be a serious partner to the North American ally,
Those are details, and I’m not dismissive of the details, they’re important. But I think the beginning here is trust-building. It’s getting everybody to understand that this war does not belong continuing, that it should end. That’s what the president has directed us to do,
I don't know what countries are supposed to do at talks on Ukraine."
What we don't want to do is get into a large group discussion,
People weren’t ready to accept it at the time, its feminism,
It risks the worst of all possible worlds: a kind of stagflation,
However, if the war were to become ‘frozen’ and Russia no longer had to suffer significant losses during the active hostilities in Ukraine, Moscow would be able to increase its military presence next to the NATO’s northeastern flank, including the Baltics, within the next five years,
Russia is likely to be more willing to use military force in a regional war against one or more European NATO countries if it perceives NATO as militarily weakened or politically divided,
Labour stated in its manifesto a commitment to set a path to 2.5 per cent and that remains the policy of the Government.
Unless Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves can find ways of producing more money, well beyond 2.5 per cent towards 3 per cent or 3.5 per cent for starters, then this Strategic Defence Review is going to be hollow, it's going to be a failure and, frankly, it'll consign Keir Starmer to the bin of history.
Well, as I say, we came into government with a clear commitment to get up to 2.5 per cent and we're having to do that alongside grappling with a wide range of challenges
Frankly, we haven't got the numbers and we haven't got the equipment to put a large force onto the ground for an extended period of time at the present moment.
These crucial days ahead will determine the future security of our continent