Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial,
Relying solely on evidentiary rulings can be challenging, as a significant portion of the decision-making process rests with the discretion of the trial judge,
This ruling may suggest that the defense will pursue the second $83-million lawsuit with renewed vigor,
The American people have re-elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed,
Taking the record as a whole and considering the strength of Ms Carroll’s case, we are not persuaded that any claimed error or combination of errors in the district court’s evidentiary rulings affected Mr Trump’s substantial rights,
Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”
In each of the three encounters, Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent. The acts are sufficiently similar to show a pattern.”
We look forward to uniting our country in the new administration as President Trump makes America great again,
Mr Trump’s statements in the [Access Hollywood] tape, together with the testimony of Ms Leeds and Ms Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms Carroll alleged,
What are the chances of that happening?”
The finding that Ms.Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again: all options are on the table.”
SHOULD A WOMAN GO TO JAIL FOR FALSELY ACCUSING A MAN OF RAPE?”
The jury made its assessment of the facts and claims on a properly developed record,
I’ve never met the woman — other than this picture, which could have been AI-generated,
Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,
The improper verdict in this case is a gross miscarriage of justice, backed by political operatives long opposed to President Trump and his politics, based on false and unsupported claims
While it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”
One of life’s most underappreciated talents is to know when it’s time to move on to life’s next chapter.”
They’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats.”