There is obviously no question of the EU letting other nations in the world, whoever they are, and I would even say starting with Russia, attack its sovereign borders,
The idea expressed about Greenland is obviously not a good one, but maybe more important, it's obviously one that's not going to happen, so we probably shouldn't waste a lot of time talking about it,
Borders must not be moved by force,
When America leads with resolve and with strength and from the front, we can do amazing things, not just for America, but for our allies abroad,
If we’re doing anything, it’s going to be a great and symbiotic relationship for all the nations and our allies. And it’s going to make the world a better, more prosperous and safer place,
The principle of inviolability of borders applies to every country, regardless of whether it is to the east or west of us,
In my discussions with our European partners, a certain lack of understanding has emerged with regard to recent statements from the USA,
There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States,
This principle applies and is a foundation of our peaceful order,
We are talking about fairly wild hypothetical stuff about an administration that hasn't come in yet."
But we are indeed speaking of something extremely theoretical on which we will not want to elaborate,
The sovereignty of our canal is not negotiable and is part of our history of struggle and an irreversible conquest,
We need Greenland for national security purposes,
There is absolutely no Chinese interference nor involvement in anything to do with the Panama Canal,
The Panama Canal is vital to our country. It's being operated by China. China! And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama. We didn't give it to China, and they've abused it. They've abused that gift. It should have never been made,
The Panama Canal was built for our military,
It is clear that the sovereignty of states has to be respected,
You say that sovereignty is paramount, but you’re not going to comment on a pretty naked threat from the incoming president of the United States. I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around that, I mean, what are you waiting for?”
Before that, for some months publicly, the Commission, the EEAS and diplomats in some member states were stating that an invasion was a hypothetical scenario, so there’s no need to intervene,
What President Trump said yesterday was a military threat to a member state, which is real: He is the president-elect of the most powerful country in the world. Are you conscious that there is a risk?”