It's hard for me to believe that targets and timing and weapons would not have been classified."
The risk of discussing highly sensitive national security information on Signal isn't so much that Signal itself is insecure. It's the fact that nation states threat actors have a demonstrated ability to remotely compromise the entire mobile phone itself. If the phone itself isn't secure, all the Signal messages on that device can be read."
My colleagues and I and the people who are giving us advice on this have some interesting conversations to have about this,
At moments like this, when they're under pressure because they've been caught with their hand in the cookie jar or whatever, you know, they will just literally say anything to get out of the moment,
You're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who's made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again,
It couldn't have been very effective, because the attack was very effective
As much as I enjoy national security investigative reporting, I don't need strike plans two hours before a launch
I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what – nobody knows who the Houthis are.”
At every turn anti-Trump forces have tried to weaponize innocuous actions and turn them into faux outrage
It's also just mind-boggling to me that all of these senior folks were on this line, and nobody bothered to even check security hygiene 101,
The fact that Fox News is in possession of these messages demonstrates exactly why Signal shouldn’t be used to discuss classified national security material like war plans."
Chris Steele asked me to call you."
Signal worked great for Senator Warner when he wanted to meet with the disgraced liar Christopher Steele. It’s a little surprising Warner is pretending to be so upset about it today,
Yes seems to have cold feet from the leaks. Said he wanted a bipartisan letter followed by written questions."
The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans."
Can you talk tomorrow want to get with ur English friend,
I think this is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time error,
No ‘war plans’ were discussed,
Two of our witnesses here today were members of a group chat that discussed highly sensitive and likely classified information that supposedly even included weapons packages, targets and timing and included the name of an active CIA agent,
Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he's a good man,